top of page

Great Scott! The Scrapped Ideas That Almost Changed Back to the Future

Updated: Oct 29

Introduction: The Masterpiece That Was Almost a Mess

Welcome to Before the Rewrite, Episode 01: Back to the Future is one of those rare, near-perfect films, an iconic masterpiece that defines a generation. But its path from script to screen was far from smooth. The beloved classic we know and quote was nearly a completely different movie, featuring a kitchen appliance for a time machine and a lead actor who played Marty McFly as a tragic hero.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ree

1. The Time Machine Was a Nuclear-Powered Refrigerator

In the film's earliest drafts, Doc Brown's time-bending invention wasn't a sleek DeLorean but a hulking, lead-lined Frigidaire. The script’s internal lore justified this choice by claiming refrigerators were “temporally conductive,” with their insulation somehow shielding the time stream. Packed with a “Power Converter” and a laser that could bend space-time, the concept grounded the extraordinary in the mundane, fulfilling the creative desire to turn "something everyday that could become extraordinary."


To activate it, Doc would transport the entire refrigerator to a nuclear test site. An atomic blast would then provide the necessary 1.21 gigawatts to send Marty, huddled inside, back to 1955.

However, executives and studio lawyers grew concerned, fearing that "Kids will hide in fridges and suffocate!" in imitation of the film. The liability concerns forced a total rethink. To keep the time machine mobile and capitalize on a convenient studio promo deal with the DeLorean Motor Company... the fridge was scrapped in favor of the now-iconic gull-winged car. The refrigerator concept wasn't entirely forgotten, though; director Steven Spielberg later referenced it as an in-joke in the infamous "nuke the fridge" scene in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2. Marty McFly Was Recast Five Weeks Into Filming

While Michael J. Fox is synonymous with Marty McFly, he wasn't the first actor cast in the role. The part originally went to Eric Stoltz, a rising method actor who was hired for $1 million, five times Fox's eventual salary.


The problem was one of tone. Stoltz, a talented dramatic actor, treated every take like a serious drama, playing Marty as a "wounded soul" with a "brooding" energy. His method approach created on-set friction, he even punched the actor playing Doc Brown for real during a scene. After five weeks of filming and spending $3 million on footage that included the entire clock tower sequence, the filmmakers realized his performance was a complete mismatch for the film's lighthearted spirit.


As director Robert Zemeckis explained: "Eric was heartbreakingly good, but this is a comedy."

The difficult decision was made to recast. Michael J. Fox, the team's first choice, was brought in. He worked a grueling schedule, shooting his sitcom Family Ties during the day and then filming Back to the Future all night. This single, costly pivot in casting likely saved the film from itself, swapping the DNA of a gritty indie drama for the blockbuster comedic charm that would make it a generational touchstone.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3. The Original Script Was a Darker Sci-Fi Titled Space Man from Pluto

The film's earliest version was a far cry from the final product. The original script, titled Space Man from Pluto, had a much darker, more sci-fi-oriented tone.


The characters were also radically different. Doc Brown was conceived not as the eccentric inventor we love but as a "darker, more unhinged figure" inspired by the Sherlock Holmes of Nicholas Meyer’s The Seven Percent Solution. Other characters were nearly unrecognizable, too; in one draft, Crispin Glover's George McFly was written as "nearly a beatnik poet." In one version of the story, the ending didn't see Marty return to a happy, successful family, but to a "punk-rock 1985."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Conclusion: Rewrites Aren't Failures, They're Flux Capacitors

The journey of Back to the Future is a powerful testament to the creative process. The changes made—from replacing a refrigerator with a DeLorean to swapping a dramatic lead for a comedic one—were not signs of failure. Instead, they prove that "rewrites aren't failures; they're flux capacitors for creativity." It makes you wonder: how many other classic films are just one pivotal rewrite away from being completely unrecognizable?


Want more? Check out our Podcast, Before the Rewite for more details:



 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

© 2020 IndieFilmWorks. All rights reserved.  🤖🎬  Entertainment Purposes Only.

🔥⚒ Powered By: xForge v42.01.β | All content is AI Generated and Curated by Film Professor Angelo Ford, MBA | MFA

bottom of page